Can someone explain how a conference that is mostly attended by Israeli or Jewish academics has become “anti-semitic” threat to Israel? There’s no doubt it is extremely anti-Israel. But did anyone see the names of the people speaking at it? Many of them are Israelis, or former Israelis and more than half the academics at the conference are Jewish, some of them long-time activists.
Here are many of the attendees based on the conference program:
Prof. Oren Ben-Dor (former Israeli from Netanya)
Prof. Gabi Piterberg (grew up in Israel)
Prof. Ilan Pappe (from Haifa, former Israeli)
Prof. Richard Falk (born Jewish, well known UN jurist)
Prof. Yosefa Loshitzky (BA and MA from Israeli universities)
Dr. Ronit Lentin (Born Haifa)
Ms. Lea Tsemel, (Israeli lawyer)
Ms. Yoella Har-Sheffi
Ms. Ofra Yeshua-Lyth (former Maariv writer and Sof Shavua editor)
Dr. Uri Davis, (From Jerusalem, calls himself “Palestinian Hebrew)
Ms. Mia Tamarin
Dr. Marcelo Svirsky (Jewish activist)
Professor Haim Bresheeth
Mr. Eitan Bronstein Aparicio (Founder of Zochrot, lives in Israel)
Professor Joel Kovel, (unaffiliated American researcher)
I mean, you can say it is a very anti-Israel conference, say it denies Israel’s rights, etc…but anti-semitic?
That’s a bit disingenuous. According to your theory ISIS could hold a perfectly normal academic conference by only inviting people such as Mohammed Emwazi and claim it is okay because the people are British – and we’d applaud. What has their nationality got to do with it?
This is a meeting of activists meeting on a topic outside of their general fields as part of their general activism against Israel. If they wont turn it into a true academic debate by inviting those that disagree, then let them do this in a village hall, not a university.
I
I’m pretty sure you read the info about this conference and are aware that it’s central focus is what the Hard Left views as Israel’s “legitimacy”, since even though the title does mention “exceptionalism” (which is a weasel word in any case), all of the spiel from the conference organizers relates back to how they feel Israel is NOT legitimate and how they hope to fix that (take a wild guess). One would normally have a problem with a sovereign state being lectured about how it shouldn’t exist, but it’s not that surprising you and your Hard Left buddies aren’t willing to admit that’s the conference’s key point.
And while you compiled a long list of impressive Azajews, I’ve noted elsewhere that they’re useful idiots for a cause that’s going to exile them from any platforms if they win at best and more likely kill them if given the chance, so, yeah.
Pingback: Southampton furore marks the unravelling of hysterical Israel lobby |·